Archive for category World's Worst Pollution Problems

From Elections to Pollution – Data is Key

One of the most interesting outcomes of this U.S. election is that it has reminded us that data is king.

Nate Silver from the New York Time’s FiveThirtyEight blog has become a celebrity of sorts for coming up with data that predicted the election results almost to a T.  The art and science of collecting, interpreting and presenting data is vital because it can give us a clearer picture of everything, from elections to global issues. Remember what Al Gore did for global warming in the film “An Inconvenient Truth?”  I’d like to think that in a similar way, our recently-released 2012 World’s Worst Pollution Problems report will help push the increasing support for pollution cleanup over the edge because for the first time, we have data about pollution’s terrible toll worldwide.

For years, the true scope of pollution’s impact has been as murky as the contaminated landscape itself. Measuring and collecting data on pollution is complicated because there are so many types of toxins and sources involved, causing a wide range of diseases that affect communities in multiple ways.

In 2000, the World Health Organization (WHO) adopted the Disability Adjusted Life Year or DALY as a measure of disease burden. DALY is expressed as the number of life years lost not only from early death but also from disability and ill health. Chronic headaches, for example, are given a lower value in the DALY metric than more severe health outcomes such as blindness or cancer.

Using this method, WHO began to calculate the health toll of diseases such as tuberculosis, malaria and HIV to show what those diseases were doing to the global community.  Today, the fight against those diseases is going strong partly because we know what the stakes are. We have the data.

In last year’s report we began to calculate the toll of pollution in select contaminated sites using data from the Toxic Sites Identification Program - our ongoing  survey of the world’s worst polluted hotspots. This year, we built on that effort to calculate, for the first time, the impact of pollution on health in 49 countries. As a result, we can now see that industrial pollution causes as much damage and suffering as some of the world’s most dangerous diseases (see a comparison of DALY numbers). With data in hand, it has become increasing clear that we have to fight toxic pollution as hard as we fight TB, malaria and HIV.

Without data, pollution is invisible. With data, we can see what’s coming and take action.

Read a selection of coverage about the 2012 World’s Worst Pollution Problems report here in The Guardian, Huffington Post, The Atlantic, Toronto Star, and the leading medical journal The Lancet.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Mother’s Day in some of the world’s worst polluted places

This Mother’s Day, as we celebrate, thank and honor our mothers for all the things they do for us, I thought I would share some images of mothers in some of the world’s worst polluted places.

I see them all the time when I visit polluted hotspots where, really, no one should be living.  I see them going about their daily, often back-breaking work, many times with children in tow.  Like many moms the world over, these women are often too busy taking care of daily necessities to do anything else, let alone ponder the extremely contaminated environment in which they happen to live.

But these women are often the key to change once they realize their children are being poisoned.  They are the ones we usually work with to raise awareness about pollution in their communities and what they can do to keep safe, until the cleanup is completed. So to these mothers on the frontlines of pollution… thanks. We are working on giving them the ultimate Mother’s Day gift – a poison-free home.

Taking a break from scavenging at a dumpsite in India

Mother and child living near the contaminated Kharkai river in eastern India

A woman extracting gold from ore in Senegal, with children and food nearby. There are over 4.5 million women and some 600,000 children who are involved in artisanal gold mining around the world, and who are exposed to direct contact with toxic mercury used in the process.

Daily housework in the middle of Ghana's notorious Sodom and Gomorrah e-wasteland - the Agbogbloshie market.

Mother sleeping with her child in the middle of Ghana's Agbogbloshie market, where most of the world's e-waste ends up.

A Blacksmith team can be seen in the background doing some site testing

Tags: , , , , ,

Doe Run Peru – A Solution in Sight

Kids in La Oroya

The embattled Doe Run lead smelting facility in Peru may finally be getting a break. We met with Dr. Juan Carlos Huyhua, the president of Doe Run Peru, in New York last week to get an update on the situation.

Three years ago, the plant was shut down by a mixture of politics and litigation. So work installing new pollution mitigating technologies at the plant stopped, cleanup was halted, and the people of La Oroya were left without work and a legacy of pollution. But not without income – we learned that the refinery has continued to pay salaries for 4,000 employees, even while the plant has been closed.  That good citizenship may now be paying off.

We’ve been told that the government of Peru is working to reach a consensus to approve a plan for Doe Run Peru within 60 days, by April 12. If everything goes well, the company expects the plant will reopen, appropriately, on May 1- labor day.

“It is a very positive message for the country that finally, working together – the state, the company and community – it is possible to solve an issue that is dated more than 90 years,” Dr. Huyhua told me.

After three years of no movement, he interprets the government’s actions as a “vote of trust” for his company.  And he is ready to go forward. Dr. Huyhua told us that Doe Run Peru plans to invest up to $200 million more in environmental projects within 30 months. The company has also continued to support the public health programs in La Oroya during the plant’s closure.

“We believe in the business,” he told me. “We consider that an investment because La Oroya needs technical people and we need to keep them.” He reiterated that it all depends now on the government. “Everyone has to work together to get results and what’s better for the country.  And that’s to reopen the plant.”

And we do agree. While corporations like Doe Run Peru are often vilified, and many are guilty of unspeakable pollution, they can be moved to make a difference because they have the resources to do so and the incentive.

This is the only way forward for the people of La Oroya, because the alternative is a stalemate in which nothing happens.  No one wins if the smelter is left shut down and contaminated. But finally installing state- of-the-art pollution management technology, and restoring livelihoods for thousands in the Andes is a goal worth reaching for.  And only then can the cleanup of legacy contamination around the town begin as well.

With the company and the government of Peru now on the same path, all this might happen.  It is the only practical solution to a massive problem.

Related:  Surprise – Corporations NOT the worst pollution problems

Tags: , , , ,

“Sensationalist” claim about tanneries and pollution

We were recently criticized by an industry group of leather manufacturers for listing tannery operations #5 on the 2011 list of world’s worst toxic pollution problems. The group called our report’s assertions “sensationalist and not appropriate.” (Read our response in Leather International magazine or link to the full download here)

The point they are missing is that even though segments of the industry, especially those connected to large corporations, may be operating responsibly to limit toxic pollution, there are enough polluting tanneries to cause a real and serious health threat to about 1.8 million people, and a black eye to the industry as a whole.

These are mainly small-scale operations (see my previous post – Surprise – Corporations Not the Worst Pollution Problems) that operate informally without much regulation. And since they usually do not have a voice or representation in unions and other leather industry groups or associations, their polluting actions sometimes fly under the radar.

So we would like to take this opportunity to invite the leather industry to work with us to solve the problem.  We know many tanneries are well run, but not all.  Help us reach out, clean up and save lives.

Here is a portion of our response:

…The Union’s primary assertion was that tanneries use non-toxic trivalent chromium in the tanning process, not toxic hexavalent chromium. Blacksmith Institute is fully aware and acknowledges this point, but it does not address the problem at hand.

Trivalent chromium is used in the tanning process to make leather more durable. Solid and liquid waste containing this non-toxic form of chromium is often discarded near tanning facilities. Unfortunately for those living near such waste, trivalent chromium easily oxidizes to become carcinogenic hexavalent chromium upon disposal.

In solid waste, this conversion requires just heat and oxygen. In liquid waste, the conversion takes place in the presence of other minerals. Hexavalent chromium is highly soluble in water and quickly contaminates drinking water supplies, causing widespread illness. The sites in Blacksmith’s database include poorly managed tanneries, abandoned chromium supplies manufacturers, and legacy waste dumps of chromium, all with credible soil and water sampling showing elevated levels of hexavalent chromium in pathways to human exposure.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Surprise – Corporations NOT the Worst Pollution Problems

Contrary to popular belief, large multinational corporations are NOT the worst pollution problems.  That was one of the more interesting findings revealed in our 2011 World’s Worst Toxic Pollution Problems report.

Kids in La Oroya

Of course large corporations are associated with pollution, like the well-documented case of the Renco Group and their Doe Run refinery, blamed for not doing enough to deal with the big lead pollution problem at their smelter in La Oroya, Peru.

But if you look at the data we’ve been collecting from thousands of hotspots we’ve assessed as part of our global inventory of polluted sites, you will see that there are just as many smaller polluting sites.  And in terms of public health, poorly regulated small-scale operations like artisanal mining and backyard metal recycling have the greatest impact globally.

Most large corporations, thanks to the efforts of tireless advocates, tend to behave as they work at managing pollution (and their image) in what is essentially a very polluting industry.

When Renco bought the previously state-run smelter in 1997, they took over one of the most toxic enterprises.  Over ten years, they have spent as much as $30 million on pollution mitigation.  They have put in water treatment, tailings management, and other controls, and were in the process of replacing the primary smelter with lower polluting and lower sulfur technologies. [Read an update of Doe Run/La Oroya's problems in Crain's New York]

Frankly, the main hope for La Oroya is if Renco/Doe Run Peru is given the chance to finish the job and complete the installation of new equipment.

They’ve been shut down by politics, the weak economy and also litigation.  The town’s livelihood has been adversely affected because the plant is not operating but in the long term, if the plant is to reopen, new equipment must be installed.

Regardless of news reports, the company has shown a lot of good faith. And for things to change, people need to work together.

With a new government in place in Peru, I hope common sense will prevail and Renco/Doe Run Peru will be able to install new equipment and finally continue the cleanup of La Oroya.

[See the Top Ten List of the 2011 World's Worst Toxic Pollution Problems report, released by Blacksmith Institute and Green Cross Switzerland at www.worstpolluted.org]

Tags: , , , , , ,

Top Ten Things You Might Not Know About Pollution

Pollution is a topic that often gets buried by talk of conservation, climate change, sustainability and energy issues.  Perhaps because it is a complex subject with lots of sources and lots of effects.  While all the above issues are important, let’s give pollution some of the talk time it deserves.

Think you know about pollution?  Read on:

Top Ten Things You Might Not Know About Pollution

1) Pollution is one of the biggest global killers, affecting over 100 million people.

It is comparable in population and risk to human health to problems like malaria and HIV.

2) Pollution is one global problem that can be solved in our lifetime

Life-threatening pollution has already been eliminated in much of the developed world through initiatives like the U.S.’s Superfund. The technology and know-how to clean up toxic pollution already exists. All that’s needed is resources and commitment.

3) There is a finite number of polluted sites in the world

While the number of polluted hotspots may increase, it is a finite figure. Currently, Blacksmith Institute’s database of polluted sites lists over 2000 of the world’s worst polluted places. Blacksmith is working to prioritize these sites for cleanup targeting the communities with the most at-risk populations.

4) Pollution solutions are relatively low-cost

The cost to save a human life through the removal of hazardous pollution on Blacksmith projects can be as little as $42. $20,000 is enough to start a project that saves lives.

5) Children are most susceptible to Pollution

While children only make up 10% of the world’s population, over 40% of the global burden of disease falls on them. More than three million children under age five die annually from environmental factors.

6) Pollution is mainly caused by small-scale informal operations rather than large multi-national companies

However, demand for consumer goods from high-income countries still drive pollution activities in low-income countries.

7) Pollution does not stop even when the source of the pollution is removed

For example when polluting factories are closed, legacy pollution remains. If it is not removed, legacy pollution continues to sicken and kill.

8 ) Pollution can vastly lower life expectancy

In some of the world’s worst polluted places life expectancy can be as low as as 45 years because of lung, throat and thyroid cancers.

9) Death is not the only end result

Pollution causes chronic illness, neurological damage and a range of diseases that might not kill but might incapacitate a person or result in irreversible damage. For instance, the presence of lead in children lowers I.Q. by an estimated 4-7 points for each increase of 10 μg/dL.

10) Pollution affects everyone

While pollution affects the immediate population the most, its effects are felt far and wide because of the globalized economy. In addition, some pollutants like mercury travels and drops into rivers and seas worldwide, poisoning the seafood supply.

Read my earlier post:  What is Pollution?

Tags: , ,

“Miracle” Mercury Recapturing Machine

Low-cost retort for recapturing mercury

This is what I like to call our “miracle” mercury recapturing machine.

Using simple, low-cost retorts like the one pictured here, Blacksmith has been able to reduce the amount of toxic mercury released into the atmosphere by an estimated 4,000 kg. This is just in 2010 alone, from our work in one mercury hotspot – Indonesia.

The mountains of Central Kalimantan in Indonesia contain as much gold as the United States. Artisanal gold mining is the main source of income here, and also one of the main sources of toxic mercury in the world.

Blacksmith has identified mercury as one of the Top Six Toxic Threats, and recent reports have pointed to a huge increase in toxic mercury exposure in the U.S.

Over the past two years, Blacksmith has been working with local Indonesian NGO Yayasan Tambuhak Sinta (YTS) to distribute over 50 low-cost mercury retorts, which can recapture as much as 97% of the mercury released by miners and gold shop owners to extract gold from ore.

Blacksmith program manager Meredith Block was recently in Indonesia and this is what she told me:

We spent one week traveling through the region on foot and by car to reach villages and mining camps in five districts. The mountains are full of gold and people are spread out over a huge area with pockets of gold mining in very remote regions.

In each place we visited, we were delighted to find that many miners and gold shop owners were using the equipment we distributed earlier, and we made plans to fix retorts that were not working or installed properly.

The miners told us they were happy that the retorts were saving them money since they used to spend about US$60 a kilo on mercury. Now they are able to reuse the recaptured mercury.  This economic incentive is important because artisanal gold mining is their main source of income and convincing them to stop mining would have been difficult. The retorts offer a fast solution to reducing mercury.  And the villagers were all starting to notice the results -  cleaner air.  They were feeling healthier.

* Note: The recovery of 10,000 kg of mercury has an economic value of about US$83,333 (Rp. 7.5 billion)

Our visit also took us into urban areas and towns where gold shops are concentrated.  This is where miners take their gold and ore to be sold. Mercury released by the gold shops pose a bigger danger because they are located in towns with bigger populations and near markets where food can be easily contaminated with toxic mercury fumes.  So I was glad to find that at every gold shop I visited, there was at least an inch layer of mercury in the retorts they were using. It was clear that the retorts were working, and they could see it too.

Because of this measurable success, we will be expanding our work to reach more villages and towns. We will be working to convince the hold-outs to use retorts their neighbors are already using, and to reach areas we have not visited before to raise awareness about the dangers of mercury poisoning and the availability of these  retorts.  Most of all, we were encouraged by requests for retorts that were coming our way unsolicited, which means word of mouth is spreading.

Also see All that Glitters and watch videos of Indonesian gold miners

Tags: , , , , , ,

Pollution: Top Six Toxic Threats

My last post pointed to new studies that indicate chronic mercury exposure in the U.S. has risen dramatically. In fact, mercury is identified as one of the Top Six Toxic Threats in Blacksmith Institute’s most recent report, which draws on the substantial volume of research conducted to identify and assess polluted sites worldwide.

Today, more than 100 million people are estimated to be at risk from toxic pollution at levels above international health standards. This is a public health issue as salient as tuberculosis, malaria, and HIV/ AIDS, and one that should receive considerable attention and resources.

So what are the Top Six Toxic Threats?  Here’s the list:

Tags: , , , , , ,

Toxic Mercury Exposure: Huge Increase in U.S., 500,000 Children At Risk

Chronic mercury exposure in the U.S. has risen dramatically, not only in numbers of people affected but also in amounts.

A study by Professor Dan Laks found that mercury was detected in only 2% of the blood samples collected over a seven-year period between 1999-2006, but it was present in 30% of samples taken in the one year between 2005-2006.  Furthermore, mercury levels of blood rose from 0.33 µg/L to 0.39 µg/L over the seven-year period, and seemed to increase with age, offering strong evidence of mercury accumulation in the blood.

Another study from Mahaffey et al. estimates that 300,000-600,000 American children born in 1999-2000 had elevated risks of neruo-developmental disorders with blood organic mercury levels of >5.8 µg/L based on the number of births and adult female blood organic mercury levels.

The Price of Gold

But why the huge increase?

The answer may lie in the rising price of gold.

Small scale gold mining is the biggest source of mercury emissions. The Mercury Watch database estimates that mercury releases from small scale gold mining have increased roughly 30% to 1320 tonnes per year in 2011 due to increased gold mining driven by the high price of gold and high poverty rates in countries where it is practiced (70 countries – see map)

Mercury:  A Global Pollutant

And the thing with mercury is that it is a truly global pollutant because it travels so well. 40% of mercury released by artisanal gold mining goes directly into the atmosphere and circulates around the globe before landing in oceans and rivers, contaminating fisheries worldwide. The remainder (about 600 tonne) goes into local waterways and soils but much of this may later also escape to the atmosphere.  So not only are miners and their families (including some 600,000 child gold miners!) at risk from mercury, but also children and pregnant women half a world away. [Read our earlier post, All That Glitters, for a solution]

Thanks to Blacksmith Technical Advisory Board member Dr. Kelvin Telmer, the executive director of the Artisanal Gold Council, who shared this information with us, and the video below:

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Virtual Tour of Chernobyl

Is nuclear power on your mind? Us too. As part of a site assessment trip to Ukraine, Blacksmith staff and technical advisers visited the world’s worst nuclear disaster site. On April 26, 1986, a series of explosions occurred at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant sending a plume of radioactive smoke into the atmosphere. As a result of the accident, over 300,000 people were evacuated from areas of Ukraine, Russia and Belarus. Now, almost 25 years to the day after that accident, we will take you on a tour of the abandoned city of Pripyat and describe the legacy of this disaster.

On April 2nd, members of Blacksmith Institute’s staff visited the 19 mile wide Chernobyl Exclusion Zone that was evacuated in the days after the explosion.  Access to the area is still tightly controlled.

From left: Oleksii Vedmidskyi, Ira May, Drew McCartor

The Exclusion Zone lies about two hours north of Kiev by car.  Before leaving our hotel, we recorded the background level of radiation in Kiev.  Using a Geiger counter to measure three types of radiation (alpha, beta, and gamma), we recorded a total radiation level of .22 microsieverts per hour (μSv/h).  For comparison, this is approximately the same level we recorded in Blacksmith’s New York office.  Use this handy chart to understand common exposure levels in microsieverts and there corresponding danger.

Radiation level at breakfast in our hotel in Kiev, Ukraine.

On our bus ride from Kiev to the Exclusion Zone, we watched a fascinating documentary called Battle of Chernobyl, that describes the months of work by over 500,000 people to contain the fallout and prevent a second explosion that would have wiped out nearly half of Western Europe.  See that video here.

As you leave Kiev, the scenery becomes bleak quickly.  The area between Kiev and Chernobyl is largely agricultural, and the road is dotted with small farming towns that appear economically depressed.  After two hours you reach the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone and pass through the first of two strictly controlled checkpoints.  The Exclusion Zone is the area from which all 50,000 residents were evacuated on April 27, 1986, the day after the explosion at the Chernobyl Nuclear Plant.

Our group of 25 appeared to be the only tour entering the Exclusion Zone that day.

The outer checkpoint at the edge of the Exclusion Zone

Radiation levels at the edge of the exclusion zone were approx. equal to Kiev and New York.

One the way into the Exclusion Zone, the checkpoints are used to record passport information and create a log of who has entered the Exclusion Zone.  On the way out, they are used to scan your body for radiation exposure.  The radiation levels at the first checkpoint were approximately the same as in our hotel in Kiev.  Our Geiger counter read 0.13 μSv/h.

The scenery begins to look eerie after entering the first checkpoint.  The road into the Exclusion Zone is lined with forests on either side, but when you look deep into the trees you can see that there are abandoned houses deep in the forest.  It becomes clear that the forest has reclaimed entire neighborhoods.

Abandoned buildings reclaimed by forest on the road into the Exclusion Zone

Our first stop within the exclusion zone was in the little town where the 3,500 engineers, scientists and military officials that work and live in the exclusion zone reside.  We entered a small museum where we were shown maps of where the radiation had migrated (with our location as the epicenter) and then were asked to sign a health liability waiver.

Map of radiation exposure after initial blast

The next stop was a field that had several military vehicles that were used in the weeks following the explosion.  Each vehicle had a radiation sign next to it and our guide told us not to touch the vehicles because they were still “hot.”  The Geiger counter read 2.72 μSv/h next to the treads of one tank, roughly 20 times the level at the first checkpoint.  However, spending an hour next to this tank at this level of radiation still exposed us to only 6% of the radiation we were exposed to just by flying to Ukraine (proximity to the sun when flying is a common source of mild radiation exposure).

Vehicle used in the area after the explosion at reactor #4

Radiation level of tank treads holding radioactive soil (2.72)

Just behind this field there was a neighborhood of abandoned houses.  When our military escort was not looking, I (Drew) was able to sneak off and examine some of those houses.  The houses were mostly bare except for gas masks littered around the floors.

Gas mask in abandoned house

Gas mask in abandon house

Radiation reading of .59 microsieverts per hour (fairly low)

Moving closer the actual nuclear plant, the levels on our Geiger counter began rise.  Chernobyl has six nuclear reactors.  Reactor four was the one that had the explosion and meltdown.  Reactor four is currently contained in a shelter built in the months following the accident.  The shelter was designed to last approximately 30 years.  This year, the shelter will be 25 years old.

Our bus finally stopped surprisingly close to reactor four, perhaps 500-1000 yards away.  After watching a documentary on the bus about the limitations of the containment facility, it felt a bit too close.  Standing near the reactor, the Geiger counter read 12.4 μSv/h, nearly 100 times the level we recorded at the first checkpoint, and 100 times the average background levels in Kiev and New York.  Risks from radiation exposure are a function of the radiation level and the duration of time spent exposed.  Although the levels near reactor 4 were 100 time higher than background levels, we were only there for 15 minutes and were not in danger (although I would not have wanted to be our guide).  Review the radiation chart again.  In reality, we were probably exposed to more radiation in our flight to Ukraine than in our visit to Chernobyl.

Side view of reactor #4 (radiation containment sarcophagus on right half)

Frontal view of reactor #4 containment sarcophagus

Gieger counter reading 12.4 uSv/h

After visiting reactor four, we were treated to a lunch in the cafeteria used by Chernobyl workers.  The cafeteria was situated directly between reactors four and six.  Although the Geiger counter recorded relatively low levels of radiation, it was an odd feeling to eat anything prepared so close to these reactors.  I will say, however, that the Borscht was quite nice!

Lunch between reactors 4 and 6 (Gieger counter reads 0.22, not 8.22)

The next stop was the ghost city of Pripyat, located very close to the nuclear facility.  This was the most remarkable and eerie part of the visit.  Residents of the city did not hear about he accident until a full day after the explosion that sent a radiation plume over the entire area.  When the roughly 48,000 residents did learn of the danger, they were given two hours to pack a few belongings and leave their homes forever.  Today, nature has taken back much of the land, and the city looks like the set of a horror movie (think 28 Days Later or any kind of mutant/zombie movie).  The pictures of Pripyat speak for themselves.

Outside the community center and gym

Inside the gym

Swimming pool

Swimming pool

The most difficult part of the visit was the elementary school.  The school appeared to have been abandoned mid-day.  Supplies and schoolwork were littered along amongst the broken glass and gas masks.

Elementary school classroom

Elementary school music classroom

Music classroom

Elementary school hallway

Geography classroom

Geography classroom

After visiting the elementary school, we went into the cultural center that had been opened just months before the disaster.

Mural in the cultural center

The greenroom behind the stage in the cultural center

Negatives found in greenroom

Negatives

The negatives show men in hard hats during the construction of the cultural center

Indoor soccer complex in cultural center - view of amusement park

Indoor soccer complex

Amusement park in the center of the city

The highest levels of radiation we observed at Chernobyl were at the amusement park

amusement park

Mural on the wall of the cultural center

This post will be updated with more information about radiation and comparisons to Japan’s disaster in the coming days.  Visit the blog again soon to learn more.  Keep up with more Blacksmith news by liking “Like” at Blacksmith’s facebook page.  If you are interested in learning about the unbelievable response in the months after this disaster, don’t forget to view The Battle of Chernobyl.

Tags: , , , ,